Senator Chris Murphy rose at heart of gun control push senses a hint of change - Fountain Prime Schools

Motto: Dedication & Sound Knowledge

https://www.canva.com/design/DAF4gu0Ww2Y/ZgqoLtlMGzstE5Te4_Tibw/edit?utm_content=DAF4gu0Ww2Y&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

Breaking

Sunday, 8 October 2017

Senator Chris Murphy rose at heart of gun control push senses a hint of change


Chris Murphy speaks during a press conference on gun violence held by Senate Democrats at the Capitol.
n the hours after the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history, when a man alone in a hotel suite sprayed gunfire on 22,000 concertgoers 32 floors below, leaving58 dead and injuring almost 500, Senator Chris Murphy rose once again to demand lawmakers do more to prevent these tragedies.It’s a grim exercise that Murphy has repeated after each mass shooting since he was elected to the Senate in 2012. That was less than a month before 26 people, including 20 children, were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary school in Newtown. As a congressman, Murphy represented the district.On Tuesday, Murphy stood again behind a lectern, facing a battery of cameras. He condemned congressional inaction in the face of what he called “a uniquely American problem”.Analysis When bias beats logic: why the US can't have a reasoned gun debate
 
“The reason that these mass shootings continue to happen – the reason that 90 people die every day across this country – is because of public policy choices that this Congress makes,” he said, his voice rising.
“This country has the loosest set of gun laws to allow dangerous people to own dangerous weapons in the industrialized world. And so what is unacceptable in the wake of the most deadly mass shooting in the history of the country is for this utter silence, this unintentional complicity from Congress, to continue.
“I think there is an unintentional endorsement that gets sent to these mass murderers when after slaughter after slaughter, Congress does nothing. If the greatest deliberative body in the world doesn’t do anything to condemn them by policy change, it starts to look like complicity.”
On the morning of 14 December 2012, Murphy was on a train platform in Bridgeport with his wife and young sons, on his way to New York City to see the Rockefeller Christmas Tree. His cellphone rang. A 15-minute drive away, in Newtown, Connecticut, 20 children about the age of his elder son had been murdered.
The newly elected senator was among the first politicians to arrive at a firehouse near the elementary school, where families waited to hear if their child had survived. His phone buzzed repeatedly. The calls were from members of Congress who had consoled constituents in the wake of shootings now seared into the national consciousness: Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson, Aurora.
Murphy has said he sometimes wishes he had not been in the firehouse that day. Being there, though, was a personal summons.
“I walked out of that tragedy feeling like I had just been handed my mission in public service,” he  told Politico last year. “That if I wasn’t able, in my career in the Senate, to do something meaningful to pay homage to those kids and those teachers, then I had failed.”
Murphy has become one of the Senate’s most vocal and tireless campaigners to impose legislative limits on guns, rededicating himself to the cause after each bloody tragedy.
He dedicated his first floor speech to the issue. In April 2013, four months after Sandy Hook, the Senate voted down a package of gun control measures. The defeat was clarifying for Murphy. If the deaths of 20 children could not alter the political debate in Washington – could anything?

No comments:

Post a Comment